Yes. In a federal case, a Jones Act seaman may be deposed by remote video when the parties stipulate to the remote format or the court orders it on motion. Rule 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a deposition by telephone or other remote means. The difficulty is the oath, not the video. Rule 30(b)(4) places the deposition where the deponent answers the questions, and that location decides who may administer the oath under Rule 28.
That single provision drives the analysis. Rule 28 supplies one set of officers inside the United States and another abroad. A deck engineer answering from a hotel room in Long Beach faces a different oath requirement than the same engineer answering from a bulk carrier off Singapore.
The Jones Act itself, codified at 46 U.S.C. § 30104, says nothing about discovery. It gives a seaman injured in the course of employment the right to bring a civil action against the employer, with a jury trial. Everything about the deposition comes from the Federal Rules.
The Rules That Govern Format, Recording, and Officer
Three rules set the ground before location enters the picture.
Rule 30(b)(4) makes the remote format a matter of agreement or court order. The parties may stipulate, or the court may order it on motion. No party may notice it unilaterally. The same provision fixes where the deposition legally occurs for purposes of Rules 28(a), 37(a)(2), and 37(b)(1). The examining attorney may sit in Houston while the deposition takes place wherever the deponent answers.
Rule 30(b)(3)(A) requires the noticing party to state the method of recording. Unless the court orders otherwise, testimony may be recorded by audio, audiovisual, or stenographic means. Attending by videoconference is not the same as noticing an audiovisual record, so counsel should decide in advance whether a legal video record is needed for possible trial use. State remote deposition rules set what else a notice must include.
Rule 30(b)(5)(A) requires the deposition to be conducted before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28, unless the parties stipulate otherwise.
Rule 28 is where location starts to matter. Under Rule 28(a)(1), a deposition inside the United States or a territory must be taken before an officer authorized to administer oaths by federal law or by the law of the place of examination, or before a person appointed by the court where the action is pending. Rule 29(a) lets the parties stipulate, unless the court orders otherwise, that a deposition be taken before any person, at any time or place, and on any notice.
Rule 28(c) disqualifies the obvious candidates. No deposition may be taken before a party’s relative, employee, or attorney; anyone related to or employed by a party’s attorney; or anyone financially interested in the action.
With that framework fixed, the analysis reduces to one question: where is the seaman?
When the Seaman Is in a United States Port
This is the simplest case. Rule 28(a)(1) applies without complication. A certified court reporter sits with the witness and administers the oath while counsel appear from anywhere. That reporter must be authorized to administer oaths in the state of examination.
Compelling attendance is a separate question, and it arises only when the crew member is not a party. Rule 45(b)(2) permits service of a subpoena anywhere in the United States, but Rule 45(c)(1)(A) limits its command to attendance within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business.
When the Seaman Is in a Foreign Port
Rule 28(b)(1) supplies four methods for a deposition taken in a foreign country:
Under a treaty or convention.
Under a letter of request, whether or not it is captioned a letter rogatory.
On notice before an authorized person, who must be authorized to administer oaths by federal law or by the law of the place of examination.
Before a court-appointed commissioner, commissioned to administer any necessary oath and take testimony.
Under Rule 28(b)(2), the court may issue a letter of request, a commission, or both, on appropriate terms after an application and notice. The applicant need not show that another manner would be impracticable or inconvenient. Which method is available depends on the host country. Some countries permit voluntary depositions with limited formality; others require government permission, consular involvement, or use of the Hague Evidence Convention. Counsel should review the Department of State country-specific judicial assistance guidance before scheduling.
Who Administers the Oath at a U.S. Consulate
The consulate is the most familiar route abroad. Under 22 U.S.C. § 4215, a consular officer must administer any oath and take any deposition when an application is made within the consulate’s limits, and under 22 CFR 92.51, notarizing officials hold that authority under federal law. The host country sets two limits. Under 22 CFR 92.4(a), the officer performs notarial acts only where a treaty or host-country law permits them. Under 22 CFR 92.55(c), an officer in a country that does not permit depositions returns the papers unexecuted and indicates what other methods may be available.
The consular route is not remote for the witness. Under 22 CFR 92.56(g), the officer is present throughout the examination, so the seaman and the officer share one room. Counsel may still appear by video from anywhere.
When the Hague Evidence Convention Governs
Rule 28(b)(1)(A) points to an applicable treaty. For many ports, that is the 1970 Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters. Chapter II governs evidence taken by diplomatic officers, consular agents, and commissioners. It matters because crews are often mixed in nationality, and the witness’s nationality decides which article applies.
Article 15. A diplomatic or consular officer may take evidence, without compulsion, from a national of the State the officer represents, in a proceeding commenced in that State’s courts. A Contracting State may require prior permission.
Article 16. Reaches nationals of the host State or a third State, again without compulsion, with permission from the host State’s designated authority and on the conditions it sets.
Article 17. Extends a comparable route to a commissioner.
Article 21(a) supplies the oath power for all three routes, limited by the law where the evidence is taken and by any permission granted. Article 33 lets a State exclude Chapter II in whole or in part, so confirm the country’s current declarations before setting the procedure.
Compelling a Seaman Who Will Not Appear Voluntarily
None of the three Chapter II routes can compel a witness to appear. Compulsion abroad comes from a different statute. Rule 45(b)(3) points counsel to 28 U.S.C. § 1783, which governs a subpoena directed to a United States national or resident abroad. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1783(a), a court may issue it on a finding that the testimony is necessary in the interest of justice and, in a civil action, that the testimony cannot be obtained in admissible form without a personal appearance. A foreign-national crew member falls outside the statute entirely.
When the Seaman Is Aboard a Vessel at Sea
The Federal Rules do not address the high seas. Rule 28(a) covers the United States and its territories; Rule 28(b) covers a foreign country. A vessel underway is neither, yet Rule 30(b)(4) still places the deposition where the deponent answers.
Because the Rules do not create a separate high-seas procedure, counsel must resolve the officer, oath, recording method, and remote arrangement before the deposition rather than assume the domestic rules apply. Where the parties agree, a Rule 29(a) stipulation, usually a written protocol that names the officer and fixes where the oath is administered, is the ordinary route. Absent agreement, a court order or another legally authorized arrangement is required.
Deposing the Seaman Before He Ships Out
Rule 30(a)(2)(A)(iii) addresses this problem directly. A party would ordinarily need leave to depose before the time set in Rule 26(d). One certification removes that requirement: the party states in the notice, with supporting facts, that the deponent is expected to leave the United States and be unavailable for examination here afterward. The 1970 Advisory Committee Note names the exact setting the provision was written for, maritime litigation, when seamen are transferred between ports or are about to go to sea. For a crew member whose vessel is about to depart, the provision preserves testimony before the logistics harden.
Preserving the Testimony for Trial
Rule 32(a)(4)(B) lets a party use the deposition for any purpose if the witness is more than 100 miles from the place of trial or is outside the United States. That permission is lost if the offering party procured the witness’s absence.
Rule 32(c) explains why the recording format matters. On any party’s request, deposition testimony offered in a jury trial for any purpose other than impeachment must be presented in nontranscript form if available, absent a good-cause order otherwise. For a seaman who may be at sea or abroad when trial begins, the video becomes the version the jury sees, which favors certified legal videographers over a platform recording.
Rule 30(d)(1) caps the deposition at one day of seven hours unless the parties stipulate or the court orders otherwise, and requires additional time where it is needed to fairly examine the deponent or where any circumstance impedes the examination. That allowance matters at sea, because interpreted depositions in cross-border cases run longer than the same examination in English.
Three Formats, One Difference
The three formats are interchangeable. What changes is where the witness and the officer physically sit.
Fully remote video. Every participant, including the officer, appears on a platform under Rule 30(b)(4), and the deposition occurs where the deponent answers.
Hybrid session. The officer sits with the witness while counsel appear remotely, which is what the consular and commissioner routes require. Even domestic cases use hybrid deposition formats for a related reason: the oath is easier to defend when the officer is in the room.
Written questions. No attorney attends. Under Rule 30(c)(3), a party serves written questions in a sealed envelope on the noticing party, who delivers them to the officer. The officer asks the deponent those questions and records the answers verbatim.
Common Mistakes in Remote Jones Act Depositions
Choosing a vendor without identifying who will administer the oath in the deponent’s location. That leaves the record exposed under Rule 28.
Treating the Rule 29(a) stipulation power as unlimited. It yields to a court order, and a case-management order can narrow what the parties may agree to.
Noticing a consular deposition without checking what the host country permits. Under 22 CFR 92.55(c), the papers come back unexecuted.
Skipping the audiovisual record because the seaman is expected to testify live. Rule 32(a)(4)(B) is written for the witness who turns out to be outside the United States when the case is called.
Schedule Your Remote Deposition With NAEGELI Deposition & Trial
NAEGELI Deposition & Trial provides nationwide remote deposition support, court reporting, legal videography, and certified legal interpreters for depositions taken in person, remotely, or in a hybrid format. We assign a video technician to every remote deposition and test the connection with counsel in advance.
Call (800) 528-3335, email schedule@naegeliusa.com, use the SCHEDULE NOW link, or start a live chat with our team.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a Jones Act seaman be deposed over video?
Yes. Rule 30(b)(4) permits a deposition by remote means when the parties stipulate or the court orders it, and nothing in the Federal Rules excludes a seaman. The open question is location, not format, because the rule places the deposition where the deponent answers, and that location determines which officer may administer the oath under Rule 28.
Who administers the oath when a crew member testifies from a foreign port?
Rule 28(b)(1) supplies four methods, most commonly a deposition on notice before a person authorized to administer oaths by federal law or by the law of the place of examination. A U.S. consular officer holds that authority under 22 U.S.C. § 4215, but only where a treaty or host-country law permits it under 22 CFR 92.4(a).
How long can a remote deposition of a seaman last?
Rule 30(d)(1) sets the default at one day of seven hours, subject to stipulation or court order. The court must allow more time where it is needed to fairly examine the deponent or where any circumstance impedes the examination. Interpreted testimony is one such circumstance a party may raise.